Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] ima_violations.sh: Check for a required policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Petr,

On Fri, 2024-12-13 at 23:20 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Add check for ^func=FILE_CHECK'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_violations.sh    | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_violations.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_violations.sh
> index 0f710dea2e..73b9fe6f30 100755
> --- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_violations.sh
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_violations.sh
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  #!/bin/sh
>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>  # Copyright (c) 2009 IBM Corporation
> -# Copyright (c) 2018-2020 Petr Vorel <pvorel@xxxxxxx>
> +# Copyright (c) 2018-2024 Petr Vorel <pvorel@xxxxxxx>
>  # Author: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  #
>  # Test whether ToMToU and open_writer violations invalidatethe PCR and are logged.
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>  TST_SETUP="setup"
>  TST_CLEANUP="cleanup"
>  TST_CNT=3
> +REQUIRED_POLICY='^func=FILE_CHECK'

The first field of an IMA policy rule is the 'action', followed by the
condition. Use "func=FILE_CHECK" instead.

thanks,

Mimi

>  
>  setup()
>  {
> @@ -17,6 +18,8 @@ setup()
>  	LOG="/var/log/messages"
>  	PRINTK_RATE_LIMIT=
>  
> +	require_ima_policy_content_if_readable "$REQUIRED_POLICY"
> +
>  	if status_daemon auditd; then
>  		LOG="/var/log/audit/audit.log"
>  	elif tst_check_cmds sysctl; then






[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux