Re: [PATCH v2] ima: instantiate the bprm_creds_for_exec() hook

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 12/3/24 6:34 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
Like direct file execution (e.g. ./script.sh), indirect file exection

typo: execution

(e.g. sh script.sh) needs to be measured and appraised.  Instantiate

If I understand the underlying patches correctly then 'sh script.sh' would be evaluated with execveat(AT_CHECK) but this requires the execute flag to be set. To maintain backwards compatibility sh cannot assume that script.sh has the execute flag set since it doesn't need today:

$ echo 'echo hi' > foo.sh
$ sh foo.sh
hi

the same is true for python:

$ echo 'print("hi")' > foo.py
$ python foo.py
hi

I am not sure which interpreters are going to be able to take advantage of this or whether they will behave differently if the x bit is set versus when it is not set...?




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux