On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 12:57 PM Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx> > > IMA stores a pointer of the ima_iint_cache structure, containing integrity > metadata, in the inode security blob. However, check and assignment of this > pointer is not atomic, and it might happen that two tasks both see that the > iint pointer is NULL and try to set it, causing a memory leak. > > Ensure that the iint check and assignment is guarded, by adding a lockdep > assertion in ima_inode_get(). > > Consequently, guard the remaining ima_inode_get() calls, in > ima_post_create_tmpfile() and ima_post_path_mknod(), to avoid the lockdep > warnings. > > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > security/integrity/ima/ima_iint.c | 5 +++++ > security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_iint.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_iint.c > index c176fd0faae7..fe676ccec32f 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_iint.c > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_iint.c > @@ -87,8 +87,13 @@ static void ima_iint_free(struct ima_iint_cache *iint) > */ > struct ima_iint_cache *ima_inode_get(struct inode *inode) > { > + struct ima_iint_cache_lock *iint_lock; > struct ima_iint_cache *iint; > > + iint_lock = ima_inode_security(inode->i_security); > + if (iint_lock) > + lockdep_assert_held(&iint_lock->mutex); > + > iint = ima_iint_find(inode); > if (iint) > return iint; Can you avoid the ima_iint_find() call here and just do the following? /* not sure if you need to check !iint_lock or not? */ if (!iint_lock) return NULL; iint = iint_lock->iint; if (!iint) return NULL; -- paul-moore.com