Re: [regression] significant delays when secureboot is enabled since 6.10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [regression] significant delays when secureboot is enabled since 6.10
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 01:40:56 +0300
Cc: <keyrings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-integrity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-integrity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "LKML" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Pengyu Ma" <mapengyu@xxxxxxxxx>, "Roberto Sassu" <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1de8359d-f231-452c-bf5c-9fc01f0ec800@leemhuis.info>

On Tue Sep 10, 2024 at 3:41 PM EEST, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> FWIW (mainly for others that later find this thread on lore), I's pretty
> sure James meant CONFIG_TCG_TPM2_HMAC.

Yeah, exactly.

BR, Jarkko

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [regression] significant delays when secureboot is enabled since 6.10
  - From: Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
- Re: [regression] significant delays when secureboot is enabled since 6.10
  - From: James Bottomley
- Re: [regression] significant delays when secureboot is enabled since 6.10
  - From: Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)

Prev by Date: [PATCH v6] tpm: Add new device/vendor ID 0x50666666
Next by Date: Re: [regression] significant delays when secureboot is enabled since 6.10
Previous by thread: Re: [regression] significant delays when secureboot is enabled since 6.10
Next by thread: Trusted keys: DCP: Unable to handle paging request
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux Kernel Hardening] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux