Could I get some feedback on this patch please? Is there something I am not doing correctly? -Jett On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 2:24 PM Jett Rink <jettrink@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Accept another DID:VID for the next generation Google TPM. This TPM > has the same Ti50 firmware and fulfills the same interface. > > Signed-off-by: Jett Rink <jettrink@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Changes in v2: > Patchset 2 applies cleanly > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c | 11 ++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c > index adf22992138e..b50005ccfc5e 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c > @@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ > #define TPM_CR50_TIMEOUT_SHORT_MS 2 /* Short timeout during transactions */ > #define TPM_CR50_TIMEOUT_NOIRQ_MS 20 /* Timeout for TPM ready without IRQ */ > #define TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID 0x00281ae0L /* Device and vendor ID reg value */ > -#define TPM_TI50_I2C_DID_VID 0x504a6666L /* Device and vendor ID reg value */ > +#define TPM_TI50_DT_I2C_DID_VID 0x504a6666L /* Device and vendor ID reg value */ > +#define TPM_TI50_OT_I2C_DID_VID 0x50666666L /* Device and vendor ID reg value */ > #define TPM_CR50_I2C_MAX_RETRIES 3 /* Max retries due to I2C errors */ > #define TPM_CR50_I2C_RETRY_DELAY_LO 55 /* Min usecs between retries on I2C */ > #define TPM_CR50_I2C_RETRY_DELAY_HI 65 /* Max usecs between retries on I2C */ > @@ -741,14 +742,18 @@ static int tpm_cr50_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client) > } > > vendor = le32_to_cpup((__le32 *)buf); > - if (vendor != TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID && vendor != TPM_TI50_I2C_DID_VID) { > + if (vendor != TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID && > + vendor != TPM_TI50_DT_I2C_DID_VID && > + vendor != TPM_TI50_OT_I2C_DID_VID) { > dev_err(dev, "Vendor ID did not match! ID was %08x\n", vendor); > tpm_cr50_release_locality(chip, true); > return -ENODEV; > } > > dev_info(dev, "%s TPM 2.0 (i2c 0x%02x irq %d id 0x%x)\n", > - vendor == TPM_TI50_I2C_DID_VID ? "ti50" : "cr50", > + vendor == TPM_CR50_I2C_DID_VID ? "cr50" : > + vendor == TPM_TI50_DT_I2C_DID_VID ? "ti50 DT" : > + "ti50 OT", > client->addr, client->irq, vendor >> 16); > return tpm_chip_register(chip); > } > -- > 2.45.2.1089.g2a221341d9-goog >