On Wed May 29, 2024 at 10:47 AM EEST, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Has this possibly fallen through the cracks?
Not possibly that is what exactly has happened, sorry.
I tweaked a bit the commit message:
commit 2c0943eba0bd765e1e4a90234e669a26a9304b74 (HEAD -> master)
Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed May 29 15:23:25 2024 +0300
tpm_tis: Do *not* flush uninitialized work
tpm_tis_core_init() may fail before tpm_tis_probe_irq_single() is
called, in which case tpm_tis_remove() unconditionally calling
flush_work() is triggering a warning for .func still being NULL.
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v6.5+
Fixes: 481c2d14627d ("tpm,tpm_tis: Disable interrupts after 1000 unhandled IRQs")
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Does this make sense to you?
> Jan
BR, Jarkko
