Hi Scott, On Sun, 2024-04-28 at 09:10 +0000, GUO Zihua wrote: > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c > index c0556907c2e6..216ffe388ce5 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c > @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry *ima_lsm_copy_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry) > * Immutable elements are copied over as pointers and data; only > * lsm rules can change > */ > - nentry = kmemdup(entry, sizeof(*nentry), GFP_KERNEL); > + nentry = kmemdup(entry, sizeof(*nentry), GFP_ATOMIC); > if (!nentry) > return NULL; > > @@ -425,7 +425,8 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry *ima_lsm_copy_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry) > > ima_filter_rule_init(nentry->lsm[i].type, Audit_equal, > nentry->lsm[i].args_p, > - &nentry->lsm[i].rule); > + &nentry->lsm[i].rule, > + GFP_ATOMIC); > if (!nentry->lsm[i].rule) > pr_warn("rule for LSM \'%s\' is undefined\n", > nentry->lsm[i].args_p); If only the call to ima_lsm_copy_rule() in ima_match_rules() needs to be GFP_ATOMIC, then pass the gfp type. thanks, Mimi > @@ -1140,7 +1141,8 @@ static int ima_lsm_rule_init(struct ima_rule_entry *entry, > entry->lsm[lsm_rule].type = audit_type; > result = ima_filter_rule_init(entry->lsm[lsm_rule].type, Audit_equal, > entry->lsm[lsm_rule].args_p, > - &entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rule); > + &entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rule, > + GFP_KERNEL); > if (!entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rule) { > pr_warn("rule for LSM \'%s\' is undefined\n", > entry->lsm[lsm_rule].args_p);