On 13/04/2024 22:26, Haener, Michael wrote: > On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 10:38 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 13/04/2024 09:15, M. Haener wrote: >>> From: Michael Haener <michael.haener@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Add the ST chip st33ktpm2xi2c to the supported compatible strings >>> of the >>> TPM TIS I2C schema. The Chip is compliant with the TCG PC Client >>> TPM >>> Profile specification. >>> >>> For reference, a datasheet is available at: >>> https://www.st.com/resource/en/data_brief/st33ktpm2xi2c.pdf >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Michael Haener <michael.haener@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >> >> >> Not tested... > > I was only able to verify and test the conformity of the ST chip > st33ktpm2xi2c with kernel 6.1, so I left out the test-by tag. I don't mean your tag. Your SoB means you tested it, but I meant you did not send the binding for testing via automation. > Unfortunately, there is no newer kernel for my embedded hardware. > >> >> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary >> people >> and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older >> kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base >> your patches on recent Linux kernel. >> >> Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of >> people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on >> some >> ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline), work on fork of kernel >> (don't, instead use mainline) or you ignore some maintainers (really >> don't). Just use b4 and everything should be fine, although remember >> about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new patches to the >> patchset. >> >> You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be >> tested by automated tooling. > > I called the script scripts/get_maintainer.pl on the latest kernel > version for each of the two patches and added the output list to the > individual patches accordingly. And only for the cover-letter I linked > the two lists together. > I understand now that I should have sent the whole series to both > lists. > No, that's not the case. You did not Cc output of get_maintainer.pl. Read *AGAIN* my message.. Best regards, Krzysztof
