On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 14:15 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 18:21 +0000, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-11-08 at 07:36 +0000, Chen Ni wrote:
> > > Add check for strsep() in order to transfer the error.
> > >
> > > Fixes: cd3bc044af48 ("KEYS: encrypted: Instantiate key with user-
> > > provided decrypted data")
> > > Signed-off-by: Chen Ni <nichen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c | 4 ++++
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c
> > > b/security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c
> > > index 8af2136069d2..76f55dd13cb8 100644
> > > --- a/security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c
> > > +++ b/security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c
> > > @@ -237,6 +237,10 @@ static int datablob_parse(char *datablob, const
> > > char **format,
> > > break;
> > > }
> > > *decrypted_data = strsep(&datablob, " \t");
> > > + if (!*decrypted_data) {
> > > + pr_info("encrypted_key: decrypted_data is
> > > missing\n");
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > This patch seems to break keyring usage in CXL and NVDIMM, with the
> > "decrypted_data is missing" error path being hit. Reverting this commit
> > fixes the tests. I'm not sure if there are valid scenarios where this is
> > expected to be empty?
> >
> > Here's an strace snippet of where the error occurs:
> >
> > keyctl(KEYCTL_SEARCH, KEY_SPEC_USER_KEYRING, "user", "nvdimm-master", 0) = 76300785
> > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/devices/platform/cxl_acpi.0/root0/nvdimm-bridge0/ndbus0/nmem0/state", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
> > read(3, "idle\n", 1024) = 5
> > close(3) = 0
> > keyctl(KEYCTL_SEARCH, KEY_SPEC_USER_KEYRING, "encrypted", "nvdimm:0", 0) = -1 ENOKEY (Required key not available)
> > uname({sysname="Linux", nodename="fedora", ...}) = 0
> > newfstatat(AT_FDCWD, "/etc/ndctl/keys/nvdimm_0_fedora.blob", 0x7fff23fbc210, 0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> > add_key("encrypted", "nvdimm:0", "new enc32 user:nvdimm-master 32", 31, KEY_SPEC_USER_KEYRING) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
>
>
> Indeed! The user-provided decrypted data should be optional. The change needs
> to be reverted.
>
Ah, thanks for confirming! Would you like me to send a revert patch or
will you do it?
Thanks,
Vishal
