Re: [PATCH] security: Don't yet account for IMA in LSM_CONFIG_COUNT calculation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2023-10-26 at 10:48 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Oct 26, 2023 Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > Since IMA is not yet an LSM, don't account for it in the LSM_CONFIG_COUNT
> > calculation, used to limit how many LSMs can invoke security_add_hooks().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  security/security.c | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Merged into lsm/dev-staging, thanks!

Welcome!

Could you please also rebase lsm/dev-staging, to move ab3888c7198d
("LSM: wireup Linux Security Module syscalls") after f7875966dc0c
("tools headers UAPI: Sync files changed by new fchmodat2 and
map_shadow_stack syscalls with the kernel sources")?

Thanks

Roberto




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux