Re: [PATCH] KEYS: trusted: tee: Refactor register SHM usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 

On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 at 13:32, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 8:55 AM Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 at 18:25, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 04:59:33PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > > The OP-TEE driver using the old SMC based ABI permits overlapping shared
> > > > buffers, but with the new FF-A based ABI each physical page may only
> > > > be registered once.
> > > >
> > > > As the key and blob buffer are allocated adjancently, there is no need
> > > > for redundant register shared memory invocation. Also, it is incompatibile
> > > > with FF-A based ABI limitation. So refactor register shared memory
> > > > implementation to use only single invocation to register both key and blob
> > > > buffers.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 4615e5a34b95 ("optee: add FF-A support")
> > > > Reported-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tee.c | 64 ++++++++----------------
> > > >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tee.c b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tee.c
> > > > index ac3e270ade69..aa3d477de6db 100644
> > > > --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tee.c
> > > > +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tee.c
> > > > @@ -65,24 +65,16 @@ static int trusted_tee_seal(struct trusted_key_payload *p, char *datablob)
> > > >       int ret;
> > > >       struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg inv_arg;
> > > >       struct tee_param param[4];
> > > > -     struct tee_shm *reg_shm_in = NULL, *reg_shm_out = NULL;
> > > > +     struct tee_shm *reg_shm = NULL;
> > > >
> > > >       memset(&inv_arg, 0, sizeof(inv_arg));
> > > >       memset(&param, 0, sizeof(param));
> > > >
> > > > -     reg_shm_in = tee_shm_register_kernel_buf(pvt_data.ctx, p->key,
> > > > -                                              p->key_len);
> > > > -     if (IS_ERR(reg_shm_in)) {
> > > > -             dev_err(pvt_data.dev, "key shm register failed\n");
> > > > -             return PTR_ERR(reg_shm_in);
> > > > -     }
> > > > -
> > > > -     reg_shm_out = tee_shm_register_kernel_buf(pvt_data.ctx, p->blob,
> > > > -                                               sizeof(p->blob));
> > > > -     if (IS_ERR(reg_shm_out)) {
> > > > -             dev_err(pvt_data.dev, "blob shm register failed\n");
> > > > -             ret = PTR_ERR(reg_shm_out);
> > > > -             goto out;
> > > > +     reg_shm = tee_shm_register_kernel_buf(pvt_data.ctx, p->key,
> > > > +                                           sizeof(p->key) + sizeof(p->blob));
> > >
> > > This is somewhat fragile. What if struct trusted_key_payload has a small
> > > unexpected change in layout?
> >
> > key and blob buffers are just two adjacent fixed sized byte arrays. So
> > I am not worried here as long as they stay adjacent (which has been
> > the case since trusted keys were introduced in the kernel).
>
> Yeah, that was my point, but fine if you don't believe it's an issue.
>

Does it resolve the issue with FFA ABI for you? It would be good to
have your Tested-by tag.

-Sumit

> Thanks,
> Jens
>
> >
> > -Sumit
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jens
> > >
> > > > +     if (IS_ERR(reg_shm)) {
> > > > +             dev_err(pvt_data.dev, "shm register failed\n");
> > > > +             return PTR_ERR(reg_shm);
> > > >       }
> > > >
> > > >       inv_arg.func = TA_CMD_SEAL;
> > > > @@ -90,13 +82,13 @@ static int trusted_tee_seal(struct trusted_key_payload *p, char *datablob)
> > > >       inv_arg.num_params = 4;
> > > >
> > > >       param[0].attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_INPUT;
> > > > -     param[0].u.memref.shm = reg_shm_in;
> > > > +     param[0].u.memref.shm = reg_shm;
> > > >       param[0].u.memref.size = p->key_len;
> > > >       param[0].u.memref.shm_offs = 0;
> > > >       param[1].attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_OUTPUT;
> > > > -     param[1].u.memref.shm = reg_shm_out;
> > > > +     param[1].u.memref.shm = reg_shm;
> > > >       param[1].u.memref.size = sizeof(p->blob);
> > > > -     param[1].u.memref.shm_offs = 0;
> > > > +     param[1].u.memref.shm_offs = sizeof(p->key);
> > > >
> > > >       ret = tee_client_invoke_func(pvt_data.ctx, &inv_arg, param);
> > > >       if ((ret < 0) || (inv_arg.ret != 0)) {
> > > > @@ -107,11 +99,7 @@ static int trusted_tee_seal(struct trusted_key_payload *p, char *datablob)
> > > >               p->blob_len = param[1].u.memref.size;
> > > >       }
> > > >
> > > > -out:
> > > > -     if (reg_shm_out)
> > > > -             tee_shm_free(reg_shm_out);
> > > > -     if (reg_shm_in)
> > > > -             tee_shm_free(reg_shm_in);
> > > > +     tee_shm_free(reg_shm);
> > > >
> > > >       return ret;
> > > >  }
> > > > @@ -124,24 +112,16 @@ static int trusted_tee_unseal(struct trusted_key_payload *p, char *datablob)
> > > >       int ret;
> > > >       struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg inv_arg;
> > > >       struct tee_param param[4];
> > > > -     struct tee_shm *reg_shm_in = NULL, *reg_shm_out = NULL;
> > > > +     struct tee_shm *reg_shm = NULL;
> > > >
> > > >       memset(&inv_arg, 0, sizeof(inv_arg));
> > > >       memset(&param, 0, sizeof(param));
> > > >
> > > > -     reg_shm_in = tee_shm_register_kernel_buf(pvt_data.ctx, p->blob,
> > > > -                                              p->blob_len);
> > > > -     if (IS_ERR(reg_shm_in)) {
> > > > -             dev_err(pvt_data.dev, "blob shm register failed\n");
> > > > -             return PTR_ERR(reg_shm_in);
> > > > -     }
> > > > -
> > > > -     reg_shm_out = tee_shm_register_kernel_buf(pvt_data.ctx, p->key,
> > > > -                                               sizeof(p->key));
> > > > -     if (IS_ERR(reg_shm_out)) {
> > > > -             dev_err(pvt_data.dev, "key shm register failed\n");
> > > > -             ret = PTR_ERR(reg_shm_out);
> > > > -             goto out;
> > > > +     reg_shm = tee_shm_register_kernel_buf(pvt_data.ctx, p->key,
> > > > +                                           sizeof(p->key) + sizeof(p->blob));
> > > > +     if (IS_ERR(reg_shm)) {
> > > > +             dev_err(pvt_data.dev, "shm register failed\n");
> > > > +             return PTR_ERR(reg_shm);
> > > >       }
> > > >
> > > >       inv_arg.func = TA_CMD_UNSEAL;
> > > > @@ -149,11 +129,11 @@ static int trusted_tee_unseal(struct trusted_key_payload *p, char *datablob)
> > > >       inv_arg.num_params = 4;
> > > >
> > > >       param[0].attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_INPUT;
> > > > -     param[0].u.memref.shm = reg_shm_in;
> > > > +     param[0].u.memref.shm = reg_shm;
> > > >       param[0].u.memref.size = p->blob_len;
> > > > -     param[0].u.memref.shm_offs = 0;
> > > > +     param[0].u.memref.shm_offs = sizeof(p->key);
> > > >       param[1].attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_OUTPUT;
> > > > -     param[1].u.memref.shm = reg_shm_out;
> > > > +     param[1].u.memref.shm = reg_shm;
> > > >       param[1].u.memref.size = sizeof(p->key);
> > > >       param[1].u.memref.shm_offs = 0;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -166,11 +146,7 @@ static int trusted_tee_unseal(struct trusted_key_payload *p, char *datablob)
> > > >               p->key_len = param[1].u.memref.size;
> > > >       }
> > > >
> > > > -out:
> > > > -     if (reg_shm_out)
> > > > -             tee_shm_free(reg_shm_out);
> > > > -     if (reg_shm_in)
> > > > -             tee_shm_free(reg_shm_in);
> > > > +     tee_shm_free(reg_shm);
> > > >
> > > >       return ret;
> > > >  }
> > > > --
> > > > 2.34.1
> > > >
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux