On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 06:35:36AM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote: > On 8/3/23 03:59, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Thu Aug 3, 2023 at 4:50 AM EEST, Mario Limonciello wrote: > >> If the TPM is opted out of hwrng the error handling for > >> tpm_chip_register() needs to know this so it doesn't try to clean > >> up an uninitialized chip->hwrng. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 3 ++- > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c > >> index e904aae9771be..8f61b784810d6 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c > >> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c > >> @@ -629,7 +629,8 @@ int tpm_chip_register(struct tpm_chip *chip) > >> return 0; > >> > >> out_hwrng: > >> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_TPM) && !tpm_is_firmware_upgrade(chip)) > >> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_TPM) && !tpm_is_firmware_upgrade(chip) && > >> + !(chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_HWRNG_DISABLED)) > >> hwrng_unregister(&chip->hwrng); > >> out_ppi: > >> tpm_bios_log_teardown(chip); > >> -- > >> 2.34.1 > > > > Please add a fixes tag. > > > > BR, Jarkko > > I didn't add a fixes tag because you hadn't sent a PR for the other one > yet so I wasn't sure the hash would be stable. Also I thought it might > just make sense to squash into it. > > If the hash is now stable, could you just just commit and add that tag > with it yourself? Or do you want me to re-send as a v2 with that? What about just sending a v3 of the patch that this patch fixes? The stable@/fixes tags in that are wrong/incomplete so Jarkko's tree will need to be fixed before pushing to Linus anyway. Jason
