Hello Jarkko, On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 09:13:57AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Mon, 2023-04-17 at 08:05 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 09:06:04AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > this series adapts the platform drivers below drivers/char/tpm to use the > > > .remove_new() callback. Compared to the traditional .remove() callback > > > .remove_new() returns no value. This is a good thing because the driver core > > > doesn't (and cannot) cope for errors during remove. The only effect of a > > > non-zero return value in .remove() is that the driver core emits a warning. The > > > device is removed anyhow and an early return from .remove() usually yields a > > > resource leak. > > > > > > The drivers converted here returned zero in their remove callback, to the > > > transformation was easy. > > > > who is responsible to pick up this patch set (or express their concerns > > when not applying it)? > > > > There is (for now) no coordination necessary, the final conversion of > > platform_driver's remove callback is still far away. So applying it via > > it's usual repo would be great. > > Please check https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jarkko/linux-tpmdd.git/ Looking at the topmost three commits in your next branch (i.e. 0760dc1b2f58fe741bddb6a0030720dfd6ac4689) it looks fine to me. Thanks Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
