On 12.03.23 02:42, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 03:35:08AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 06:43:47PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>> [adding Linux to the list of recipients] >>> >>> On 08.03.23 10:42, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: >>>> Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker. Top-posting >>>> for once, to make this easily accessible to everyone. >>>> >>>> Jarkko, thx for reviewing and picking below fix up. Are you planning to >>>> send this to Linus anytime soon, now that the patch was a few days in >>>> next? It would be good to get this 6.1 regression finally fixed, it >>>> already took way longer then the time frame >>>> Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst outlines for a case like >>>> this. But well, that's how it is sometimes... >>> >>> Linus, would you consider picking this fix up directly from here or from >>> linux-next (8699d5244e37)? It's been in the latter for 9 days now >>> afaics. And the issue seems to bug more than just one or two users, so >>> it IMHO would be good to get this finally resolved. >>> >>> Jarkko didn't reply to my inquiry, guess something else keeps him busy. >> >> That's a bit arrogant. You emailed only 4 days ago. >> >> I'm open to do PR for rc3 with the fix, if it cannot wait to v6.4 pr. > > If this is about slow response with kernel bugzilla: [...] Not at all, I don't care if developers use bugzilla or ignore it, as long as the regression itself it dealt with. Fun fact: I actually wanted to get rid of bugzilla for developers/ subsystems that didn't opt-in, but then another plan came up. See https://lwn.net/Articles/910740/ Ciao, Thorsten
