On 12/03/2023 02:53, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 06:35:40PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> The driver can be compile tested with !CONFIG_OF or !CONFIG_ACPI making
>>
>> drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/i2c.c:141:34: error: ‘of_st33zp24_i2c_match’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
>> drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/spi.c:258:34: error: ‘of_st33zp24_spi_match’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Please also briefly describe the change.
I lost there piece of word. Should be:
"The driver can be compile tested with !CONFIG_OF or !CONFIG_ACPI making
unused."
This is self-descriptive, I think. We allow it to be unused. Solution is
trivial and so common, I am really not sure what's the benefit to repeat
the code in the commit msg 100 times... The code is really obvious, thus
the commit msg focuses on the "why".
>
>> ---
>> drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/i2c.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/spi.c | 4 ++--
>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/i2c.c b/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/i2c.c
>> index c4d0b744e3cc..2d28f55ef490 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/i2c.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/i2c.c
>> @@ -138,13 +138,13 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id st33zp24_i2c_id[] = {
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, st33zp24_i2c_id);
>>
>> -static const struct of_device_id of_st33zp24_i2c_match[] = {
>> +static const struct of_device_id of_st33zp24_i2c_match[] __maybe_unused = {
>> { .compatible = "st,st33zp24-i2c", },
>> {}
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_st33zp24_i2c_match);
>>
>> -static const struct acpi_device_id st33zp24_i2c_acpi_match[] = {
>> +static const struct acpi_device_id st33zp24_i2c_acpi_match[] __maybe_unused = {
>> {"SMO3324"},
>> {}
Best regards,
Krzysztof
