On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 02:54:36AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 12:31:20PM -0300, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > Do not register a hwrng for certain AMD TPMs that are running an old > > What do you mean by "certain AMD TPMs"? > > > known-buggy revision. Do this by probing the TPM2_PT_MANUFACTURER, > > Which revision? > > > TPM2_PT_FIRMWARE_VERSION_1, and TPM2_PT_FIRMWARE_VERSION_2 properties, > > and failing when an "AMD"-manufactured TPM2 chip is below a threshold. > > What do you mean by "threshold"? > > This also lacks desription of: > > 1. What kind of changes are done. > 2. Why do they they are reasonable. YEP! And guess what? It doesn't matter at all one bit. Why? Because Mario, the AMD engineer working on this, is tuned into the goal here and he's the one who will be reworking this PoC draft into a real non-RFC commit. We've been discussing this over on the bugzilla Thorsten sent to you on Feb 2: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216989 > > BROKEN BROKEN BROKEN - I just made the version numbers up and haven't > > tested this because I don't actually have hardware for it. I'm posting > > this so that Mario can take over its development and submit a v2 himself > > once he has confirmed the versioning info from inside AMD. > > Is this paragraph meant for commit log? Obviously not; did you read it? Jason
