[PATCH ima-evm-utils v2] Introduce expect_pass_if() and expect_fail_if()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx>

Introduce these functions to let the developer specify which kernel patches
are required for the tests to be successful (either pass or fail). If a
test is not successful, print those patches in the test result summary.

First, the developer should declare an array, named PATCHES, with the list
of all kernel patches that are required by the tests. For example:

PATCHES=(
'patch 1 title'
...
'patch N title'
)

Second, the developer could replace the existing expect_pass() and
expect_fail() respectively with expect_pass_if() and expect_fail_if(), and
add the indexes in the PATCHES array as the first argument, enclosed with
quotes. The other parameters of expect_pass() and expect_fail() remain the
same.

In the following example, the PATCHES array has been added to a new test
script, tests/mmap_check.test:

PATCHES=(
'ima: Align ima_file_mmap() parameters with mmap_file LSM hook'
'ima: Introduce MMAP_CHECK_REQPROT hook'
)

Then, expect_pass() has been replaced with expect_pass_if():

expect_pass_if '0' check_mmap "MMAP_CHECK" "read_implies_exec"

The resulting output when a test fails (if the required patch is not
applied) is:

Test: check_mmap (hook="MMAP_CHECK", test_mmap arg: "read_implies_exec")
Result (expect found): not found
Possibly missing patches:
 - ima: Align ima_file_mmap() parameters with mmap_file LSM hook

Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changelog

v1:
- Declare idx variables as local

 tests/functions.sh | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/functions.sh b/tests/functions.sh
index 2c4d20536316..ed06040b394d 100755
--- a/tests/functions.sh
+++ b/tests/functions.sh
@@ -100,6 +100,25 @@ expect_pass() {
   return $ret
 }
 
+expect_pass_if() {
+  local indexes="$1"
+  local ret idx
+
+  shift
+
+  expect_pass "$@"
+  ret=$?
+
+  if [ $ret -ne 0 ] && [ $ret -ne 77 ] && [ -n "$PATCHES" ]; then
+    echo $YELLOW"Possibly missing patches:"$NORM
+    for idx in $indexes; do
+      echo $YELLOW" - ${PATCHES[$((idx))]}"$NORM
+    done
+  fi
+
+  return $ret
+}
+
 # Eval negative test (one that should fail) and account its result
 expect_fail() {
   local ret
@@ -137,6 +156,25 @@ expect_fail() {
   return $ret
 }
 
+expect_fail_if() {
+  local indexes="$1"
+  local ret idx
+
+  shift
+
+  expect_fail "$@"
+  ret=$?
+
+  if { [ $ret -eq 0 ] || [ $ret -eq 99 ]; } && [ -n "$PATCHES" ]; then
+    echo $YELLOW"Possibly missing patches:"$NORM
+    for idx in $indexes; do
+      echo $YELLOW" - ${PATCHES[$((idx))]}"$NORM
+    done
+  fi
+
+  return $ret
+}
+
 # return true if current test is positive
 _test_expected_to_pass() {
   [ ! $TFAIL ]
-- 
2.25.1




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux