Re: Stable backport request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 09:50:09AM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Stable team,
> 
> Please backport these upstream commits to stable kernels:
> - c7423dbdbc9e ("ima: Handle -ESTALE returned by
> ima_filter_rule_match()"
> 
> Dependency on:
> - d57378d3aa4d ("ima: Simplify ima_lsm_copy_rule")
> 
> Known minor merge conflicts:
> - Commit: 65603435599f ("ima: Fix trivial typos in the comments") fixed
> "refrences" spelling, causes a merge conflict.
> - Commit 28073eb09c5a ("ima: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang") adds
> a "break;" before "default:", causes a merge conflict.
> 
> Simplifies backporting to linux-5.4.y:
> - 465aee77aae8 ("ima: Free the entire rule when deleting a list of
> rules")
>   except for the line "kfree(entry->keyrings);" - introduced in 5.6.y.
> - 39e5993d0d45 ("ima: Shallow copy the args_p member of
> ima_rule_entry.lsm elements")
> - b8867eedcf76 ("ima: Rename internal filter rule functions")
> - f60c826d0318 ("ima: Use kmemdup rather than kmalloc+memcpy")

I'm sorry, but I'm confused.

What exact commits are needed in what order for which stable trees?

> A patch for kernels prior to commit b16942455193 ("ima: use the lsm
> policy
> update notifier") will be posted separately.

But that commit has been backported to 4.19.y and newer stable trees,
right?

confused,

greg k-h



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux