On Tue, 2022-10-25 at 15:33 +0200, Nicolas Bouchinet wrote: > > Agreed, independently as to whether BPF defines a security xattr, if > > two LSMs initialize security xattrs, then this change is needed. Are > > there any other examples? > > I think that in its current state the kernel cannot load two LSM capable of xattr > initialization as they are all defined with the `LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE` flag set. > But I may be unaware of other LSM in development stage. Casey, Paul, can we get confirmation on this? > > > > (nit: I understand the line size has generally been relaxed, but for > > IMA/EVM I would prefer it to be remain as 80 chars.) > > > > No problem, will change it ! > > I'll take time to run few tests with BPF and send a patch v3 with new changes. Since Roberto's patches will address the BPF bug(s), is this a fix for a real bug or a possbile future one. Cc'ing stable might not be necessary. thanks, Mimi
