Re: [PATCH v3 08/11] PM: hibernate: Use TPM-backed keys to encrypt image

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 09:49:19AM -0700, Evan Green wrote:
> When using encrypted hibernate images, have the TPM create a key for us
> and seal it. By handing back a sealed blob instead of the raw key, we
> prevent usermode from being able to decrypt and tamper with the
> hibernate image on a different machine.
> 
> We'll also go through the motions of having PCR23 set to a known value at
> the time of key creation and unsealing. Currently there's nothing that
> enforces the contents of PCR23 as a condition to unseal the key blob,
> that will come in a later change.
> 
> Sourced-from: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evgreen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
> Matthew's incarnation of this patch is at:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/patch/20210220013255.1083202-9-matthewgarrett@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> Changes in v3:
>  - ENCRYPTED_HIBERNATION needs TRUSTED_KEYS builtin for
>    key_type_trusted.
>  - Remove KEYS dependency since it's covered by TRUSTED_KEYS (Kees)
> 
> Changes in v2:
>  - Rework load/create_kernel_key() to eliminate a label (Andrey)
>  - Call put_device() needed from calling tpm_default_chip().
> 
>  kernel/power/Kconfig   |   1 +
>  kernel/power/snapenc.c | 207 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  kernel/power/user.h    |   1 +
>  3 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/power/Kconfig b/kernel/power/Kconfig
> index cd574af0b43379..2f8acbd87b34dc 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/power/Kconfig
> @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ config ENCRYPTED_HIBERNATION
>  	bool "Encryption support for userspace snapshots"
>  	depends on HIBERNATION_SNAPSHOT_DEV
>  	depends on CRYPTO_AEAD2=y
> +	depends on TRUSTED_KEYS=y
>  	default n
>  	help
>  	  Enable support for kernel-based encryption of hibernation snapshots
> diff --git a/kernel/power/snapenc.c b/kernel/power/snapenc.c
> index cb90692d6ab83a..90079f6d4f184b 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/snapenc.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/snapenc.c
> @@ -4,13 +4,23 @@
>  #include <linux/crypto.h>
>  #include <crypto/aead.h>
>  #include <crypto/gcm.h>
> +#include <keys/trusted-type.h>
> +#include <linux/key-type.h>
>  #include <linux/random.h>
>  #include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/tpm.h>
>  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>  
>  #include "power.h"
>  #include "user.h"
>  
> +/* sha256("To sleep, perchance to dream") */
> +static struct tpm_digest known_digest = { .alg_id = TPM_ALG_SHA256,
> +	.digest = {0x92, 0x78, 0x3d, 0x79, 0x2d, 0x00, 0x31, 0xb0, 0x55, 0xf9,
> +		   0x1e, 0x0d, 0xce, 0x83, 0xde, 0x1d, 0xc4, 0xc5, 0x8e, 0x8c,
> +		   0xf1, 0x22, 0x38, 0x6c, 0x33, 0xb1, 0x14, 0xb7, 0xec, 0x05,
> +		   0x5f, 0x49}};
> +
>  /* Encrypt more data from the snapshot into the staging area. */
>  static int snapshot_encrypt_refill(struct snapshot_data *data)
>  {
> @@ -313,6 +323,12 @@ void snapshot_teardown_encryption(struct snapshot_data *data)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> +	if (data->key) {

Would be a helpful to have perhaps inline comment before the check.

Just stating this because I did not exactly follow why the null
check was needed (but do believe that there are good reasons to
do it).

> +		key_revoke(data->key);
> +		key_put(data->key);
> +		data->key = NULL;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (data->aead_req) {
>  		aead_request_free(data->aead_req);
>  		data->aead_req = NULL;
> @@ -381,11 +397,83 @@ static int snapshot_setup_encryption_common(struct snapshot_data *data)
>  	return rc;
>  }
>  
> +static int snapshot_create_kernel_key(struct snapshot_data *data)
> +{
> +	const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
> +	struct tpm_digest *digests = NULL;
> +	struct tpm_chip *chip;
> +	struct key *key = NULL;
> +	int ret, i;
> +	/* Create a key sealed by the SRK. */
> +	char *keyinfo = "new\t32\tkeyhandle=0x81000000";

Again, I'd consider put this declaration as first.

> +
> +	chip = tpm_default_chip();
> +	if (!chip)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	if (!(tpm_is_tpm2(chip))) {
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> +		goto out_dev;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = tpm_pcr_reset(chip, 23);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	digests = kcalloc(chip->nr_allocated_banks, sizeof(struct tpm_digest),
> +			  GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!digests) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i <= chip->nr_allocated_banks; i++) {
> +		digests[i].alg_id = chip->allocated_banks[i].alg_id;
> +		if (digests[i].alg_id == known_digest.alg_id)
> +			memcpy(&digests[i], &known_digest, sizeof(known_digest));
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = tpm_pcr_extend(chip, 23, digests);
> +	if (ret != 0)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	key = key_alloc(&key_type_trusted, "swsusp", GLOBAL_ROOT_UID,
> +			GLOBAL_ROOT_GID, cred, 0, KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA,
> +			NULL);
> +
> +	if (IS_ERR(key)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(key);
> +		key = NULL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = key_instantiate_and_link(key, keyinfo, strlen(keyinfo) + 1, NULL,
> +				       NULL);

Generally speaking, even if it somehow would be "safe", not strlen()
thank you.

AFAIK, keyinfo is a constant so you could just as well use sizeof().
And then you would not need "+ 1".

> +	if (ret != 0)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	data->key = key;
> +	key = NULL;
> +
> +out:
> +	if (key) {
> +		key_revoke(key);
> +		key_put(key);
> +	}
> +
> +	kfree(digests);
> +	tpm_pcr_reset(chip, 23);
> +
> +out_dev:
> +	put_device(&chip->dev);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  int snapshot_get_encryption_key(struct snapshot_data *data,
>  	struct uswsusp_key_blob __user *key)
>  {
> -	u8 aead_key[SNAPSHOT_ENCRYPTION_KEY_SIZE];
>  	u8 nonce[USWSUSP_KEY_NONCE_SIZE];
> +	struct trusted_key_payload *payload;
>  	int rc;
>  	/* Don't pull a random key from a world that can be reset. */
>  	if (data->ready)
> @@ -399,21 +487,28 @@ int snapshot_get_encryption_key(struct snapshot_data *data,
>  	get_random_bytes(nonce, sizeof(nonce));
>  	memcpy(&data->nonce_low, &nonce[0], sizeof(data->nonce_low));
>  	memcpy(&data->nonce_high, &nonce[8], sizeof(data->nonce_high));
> -	/* Build a random key */
> -	get_random_bytes(aead_key, sizeof(aead_key));
> -	rc = crypto_aead_setkey(data->aead_tfm, aead_key, sizeof(aead_key));
> +
> +	/* Create a kernel key, and set it. */
> +	rc = snapshot_create_kernel_key(data);
> +	if (rc)
> +		goto fail;
> +
> +	payload = data->key->payload.data[0];
> +	/* Install the key */
> +	rc = crypto_aead_setkey(data->aead_tfm, payload->key, SNAPSHOT_ENCRYPTION_KEY_SIZE);
>  	if (rc)
>  		goto fail;
>  
> -	/* Hand the key back to user mode (to be changed!) */
> -	rc = put_user(sizeof(struct uswsusp_key_blob), &key->blob_len);
> +	/* Hand the key back to user mode in sealed form. */
> +	rc = put_user(payload->blob_len, &key->blob_len);
>  	if (rc)
>  		goto fail;
>  
> -	rc = copy_to_user(&key->blob, &aead_key, sizeof(aead_key));
> +	rc = copy_to_user(&key->blob, &payload->blob, payload->blob_len);
>  	if (rc)
>  		goto fail;
>  
> +	/* The nonce just gets handed back in the clear. */
>  	rc = copy_to_user(&key->nonce, &nonce, sizeof(nonce));
>  	if (rc)
>  		goto fail;
> @@ -425,10 +520,99 @@ int snapshot_get_encryption_key(struct snapshot_data *data,
>  	return rc;
>  }
>  
> +static int snapshot_load_kernel_key(struct snapshot_data *data,
> +	struct uswsusp_key_blob *blob)

Bad alignment.

> +{
> +
> +	const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
> +	char *keytemplate = "load\t%s\tkeyhandle=0x81000000";

Ditto.

> +	struct tpm_digest *digests = NULL;
> +	char *blobstring = NULL;
> +	char *keyinfo = NULL;
> +	struct tpm_chip *chip;
> +	struct key *key = NULL;
> +	int i, ret;
> +
> +	chip = tpm_default_chip();
> +	if (!chip)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	if (!(tpm_is_tpm2(chip))) {
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> +		goto out_dev;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = tpm_pcr_reset(chip, 23);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	digests = kcalloc(chip->nr_allocated_banks, sizeof(struct tpm_digest),
> +			  GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!digests)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i <= chip->nr_allocated_banks; i++) {
> +		digests[i].alg_id = chip->allocated_banks[i].alg_id;
> +		if (digests[i].alg_id == known_digest.alg_id)
> +			memcpy(&digests[i], &known_digest, sizeof(known_digest));
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = tpm_pcr_extend(chip, 23, digests);
> +	if (ret != 0)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	blobstring = kmalloc(blob->blob_len * 2, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!blobstring) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	bin2hex(blobstring, blob->blob, blob->blob_len);
> +	keyinfo = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, keytemplate, blobstring);
> +	if (!keyinfo) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	key = key_alloc(&key_type_trusted, "swsusp", GLOBAL_ROOT_UID,
> +			GLOBAL_ROOT_GID, cred, 0, KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA,
> +			NULL);
> +
> +	if (IS_ERR(key)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(key);
> +		key = NULL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = key_instantiate_and_link(key, keyinfo, strlen(keyinfo) + 1, NULL,
> +				       NULL);

Ditto.

> +	if (ret != 0)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	data->key = key;
> +	key = NULL;
> +
> +out:
> +	if (key) {
> +		key_revoke(key);
> +		key_put(key);
> +	}
> +
> +	kfree(keyinfo);
> +	kfree(blobstring);
> +	kfree(digests);
> +	tpm_pcr_reset(chip, 23);
> +
> +out_dev:
> +	put_device(&chip->dev);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  int snapshot_set_encryption_key(struct snapshot_data *data,
>  	struct uswsusp_key_blob __user *key)
>  {
>  	struct uswsusp_key_blob blob;
> +	struct trusted_key_payload *payload;
>  	int rc;
>  
>  	/* It's too late if data's been pushed in. */
> @@ -444,13 +628,18 @@ int snapshot_set_encryption_key(struct snapshot_data *data,
>  	if (rc)
>  		goto crypto_setup_fail;
>  
> -	if (blob.blob_len != sizeof(struct uswsusp_key_blob)) {
> +	if (blob.blob_len > sizeof(key->blob)) {
>  		rc = -EINVAL;
>  		goto crypto_setup_fail;
>  	}
>  
> +	rc = snapshot_load_kernel_key(data, &blob);
> +	if (rc)
> +		goto crypto_setup_fail;
> +
> +	payload = data->key->payload.data[0];
>  	rc = crypto_aead_setkey(data->aead_tfm,
> -				blob.blob,
> +				payload->key,
>  				SNAPSHOT_ENCRYPTION_KEY_SIZE);
>  
>  	if (rc)
> diff --git a/kernel/power/user.h b/kernel/power/user.h
> index 6823e2eba7ec53..591b30bb213349 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/user.h
> +++ b/kernel/power/user.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct snapshot_data {
>  	uint64_t crypt_total;
>  	uint64_t nonce_low;
>  	uint64_t nonce_high;
> +	struct key *key;
>  #endif
>  
>  };
> -- 
> 2.31.0
> 

BR, Jarkko



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux