Re: [PATCH] ima: Handle -ESTALE returned by ima_filter_rule_match()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2022-08-23 at 16:12 +0800, Guozihua (Scott) wrote:
> > The question is whether we're waiting for the SELinux policy to change
> > from ESTALE or whether it is the number of SELinux based IMA policy
> > rules or some combination of the two.  Retrying three times seems to be
> > random.  If SELinux waited for ESTALE to change, then it would only be
> > dependent on the time it took to update the SELinux based IMA policy
> > rules.
> 
> We are waiting for ima_lsm_update_rules() to finish re-initializing all 
> the LSM based rules.

Fine.  Hopefully retrying a maximum of 3 times is sufficient.

-- 
thanks,

Mimi




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux