Re: [PATCH 08/10] PM: hibernate: Mix user key in encrypted hibernate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 04:21:00PM -0700, Evan Green wrote:
> +/*
> + * Allow user mode to fold in key material for the data portion of the hibernate
> + * image.
> + */
> +struct uswsusp_user_key {
> +	/* Kernel returns the metadata size. */
> +	__kernel_loff_t meta_size;
> +	__u32 key_len;
> +	__u8 key[16];
> +	__u32 pad;
> +};

Shouldn't the key field be 32 bytes?

> +/* Derive a key from the kernel and user keys for data encryption. */
> +static int snapshot_use_user_key(struct snapshot_data *data)
> +{
> +	struct shash_desc *desc;
> +	u8 digest[SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE];
> +	struct trusted_key_payload *payload;
> +	struct crypto_shash *tfm;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	tfm = crypto_alloc_shash("sha256", 0, 0);
> +	if (IS_ERR(tfm)) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto err_rel;
> +	}
> +
> +	desc = kmalloc(sizeof(struct shash_desc) +
> +		       crypto_shash_descsize(tfm), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!desc) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto err_rel;
> +	}
> +
> +	desc->tfm = tfm;
> +	ret = crypto_shash_init(desc);
> +	if (ret != 0)
> +		goto err_free;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Hash the kernel key and the user key together. This folds in the user
> +	 * key, but not in a way that gives the user mode predictable control
> +	 * over the key bits. Hash in all 32 bytes of the key even though only 16
> +	 * are in active use as extra salt.
> +	 */
> +	payload = data->key->payload.data[0];
> +	crypto_shash_update(desc, payload->key, MIN_KEY_SIZE);
> +	crypto_shash_update(desc, data->user_key, sizeof(data->user_key));
> +	crypto_shash_final(desc, digest);
> +	ret = crypto_aead_setkey(data->aead_tfm,
> +				 digest,
> +				 SNAPSHOT_ENCRYPTION_KEY_SIZE);
> +
> +err_free:
> +	kfree(desc);
> +
> +err_rel:
> +	crypto_free_shash(tfm);
> +	return ret;
> +}

Just select CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256, and you can use sha256_init/update/final which
would be much simpler.  Similarly with sha256_data() that is added by the next
patch; you could just call sha256().

- Eric



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux