On Wed, 2022-06-15 at 21:26 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 01:08:46PM +0200, LinoSanfilippo@xxxxxx wrote: > > From: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > The test for interrupts in tpm_tis_send() is skipped if the flag > > TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ is not set. Since the current code never sets the flag > > initially the test is never executed. > > > > Fix this by setting the flag in tpm_tis_gen_interrupt() right after > > interrupts have been enabled. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 5 +++++ > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c > > b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c > > index e5edf745fb23..be229c173f10 100644 > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c > > @@ -774,11 +774,16 @@ static int tpm_tis_gen_interrupt(struct tpm_chip > > *chip) > > if (ret < 0) > > return ret; > > > > + chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ; > > + > > if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) > > ret = tpm2_get_tpm_pt(chip, 0x100, &cap2, desc); > > else > > ret = tpm1_getcap(chip, TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_TIMEOUT, &cap, > > desc, 0); > > > > + if (ret) > > + chip->flags &= ~TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ; > > + > > release_locality(chip, 0); > > > > return ret; > > -- > > 2.36.1 > > > > James, do you have a chance to test this on your side? Thanks. > > BR, Jarkko Hi guys, for me this series causes boot problems - somehow feels like an interrupt storm... Not sure yet, which commit is causing that. I'll do more testing tomorrow. @Tim could you test on any of your devices, please? BR Michael
