Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Yeah, dunno, I guess I'm slightly more on the side of not requiring it, > since we don't do the same for kmalloc() etc. and probably really > wouldn't want to add kmalloc_s() that does it ;-) I suspect the number of bugs this catches will be small, but they'll be in places where the flow of control is complicated. What we want is to know that there's no "real" value already present. I'd love it if we could make the macro declare a new name (yeah, I know, mixing declarations and code). Of course, we could also end up with people writing a wrapping macro that sets the variable to NULL before invoking the underlying macro... -- -keith
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
