I have sent a separate email to the list with the patch, in which I have cut out the long explanation, added Signed-off-by, and added the delimiter for the diff. Let me know if there are anything else I have overlooked. Regards Jes On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 4:21 PM Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 04:00:31PM -0700, Jes Klinke wrote: > > Hello Peter, > > > > I am a firmware engineer working on the TPM chip in Chromebooks (known > > as cr50). As we plan to deploy a new codebase on our TPM chips, we > > will have them present a new DID:VID value, but otherwise follow the > > same protocol as the existing implementations. > > > > The below patch has the effect of accepting one additional numerical > > value, and logging one of two messages, depending on the value. > > Unfortunately, I had to reverse the indentation, so the diff appears > > to touch more lines than it needed to do. > > > > I am unsure which procedure to follow, as this is my first kernel > > patch. Let me know if posting the patch inline like this is not the > > way to go. > > Can you take a look at Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst? > > - Eric
