Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix bugs in public_key_verify_signature()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Eric,

On 2/1/22 8:34 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
This patchset fixes some bugs in public_key_verify_signature() where it
could be tricked into using the wrong algorithm, as was discussed at
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20211202215507.298415-1-zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#t

I'd appreciate it if the people who care about each of the supported
public key algorithms (RSA, ECDSA, ECRDSA, and SM2) would test this
patchset to make sure it still works for their use case(s).  I've tested
that X.509 and PKCS#7 with RSA still work.

Note, I have *not* included a fix for SM2 being implemented incorrectly.
That is another bug that I pointed out in the above thread.  I think
that bug is for the people who actually care about SM2.

This applies to v5.17-rc2.


Sorry for the late reply, thanks for your work.

I did the test and the x509 certificate for SM2-with-SM3 is working
fine.

Tested-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Regarding the algorithm information in the signature data used by SM2,
I will add a patch to fix this issue, thanks for pointing it out.

Best regards,
Tianjia

Eric Biggers (2):
   KEYS: asymmetric: enforce that sig algo matches key algo
   KEYS: asymmetric: properly validate hash_algo and encoding

  crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_verify.c    |   6 --
  crypto/asymmetric_keys/public_key.c      | 126 ++++++++++++++++-------
  crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c |   6 --
  3 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)


base-commit: 26291c54e111ff6ba87a164d85d4a4e134b7315c



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux