Re: [RESEND][PATCH] Documentation: added order requirement for ima_hash=

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2022/1/26 8:14, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
GUO Zihua <guozihua@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

From: Guo Zihua <guozihua@xxxxxxxxxx>

Commandline parameter ima_hash= and ima_template= has order requirement
for them to work correctly together. Namely ima_hash= must be
specified after ima_template=, otherwise ima_template= will be ignored.

The reason is that when handling ima_hash=, ima template would be set to
the default value if it has not been initialized already, and that value
cannot be changed afterwards by ima_template=.

This patch adds this limitation to the documentation.

Reviewed-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Guo Zihua <guozihua@xxxxxxxxxx>

I've applied this, but I'm wondering: where did this review take place?
I can't find it on the lists...

Thanks,

jon
.

Hi Jonathan,

Thank you very much and sorry for the confusion here. The reviewed by is more like a face-to-face peer review and I would like to mention that in the patch. If this is problematic I would stop doing that from now on.

--
Best
GUO Zihua



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux