Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] selftests: tpm: add async space test with noneexisting handle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/16/22 12:04, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
$ b4 am20220116012627.2031-2-tstruk@xxxxxxxxx
Looking uphttps://lore.kernel.org/r/20220116012627.2031-2-tstruk%40gmail.com
Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/20220116012627.2031-2-tstruk%40gmail.com/t.mbox.gz
Analyzing 4 messages in the thread
Will use the latest revision: v4
You can pick other revisions using the -vN flag
Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment...
---
   ✓ [PATCH v4 1/2] tpm: Fix error handling in async work
     ✓ Signed: DKIM/gmail.com
     + Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen<jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>  (✓ DKIM/kernel.org)
   ERROR: missing [2/2]!
---
Total patches: 1
---
WARNING: Thread incomplete!
  Link:https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220116012627.2031-1-tstruk@xxxxxxxxx
  Base: applies clean to current tree
        git am ./v4_20220115_tstruk_tpm_fix_error_handling_in_async_work.mbx

The patch set is broken. It has patches from two different patch sets.

I saved the 2nd patch from my email client.

I'm not sure why it doesn't like it. They both are generated with the same
git format-patch command. If you look at the source, the first one is:

Message-Id: <20220116012627.2031-1-tstruk@xxxxxxxxx>

and the second is:

Message-Id: <20220116012627.2031-2-tstruk@xxxxxxxxx>

and contains:

In-Reply-To: <20220116012627.2031-1-tstruk@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <20220116012627.2031-1-tstruk@xxxxxxxxx>

Maybe it doesn't like the fact that the first in v4 and the second in v3?
Do you need me to do anything else to get that applied?

--
Thanks,
Tadeusz



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux