Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] tpm: Fix error handling in async work

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 11:07:22PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 10:47:29AM -0800, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> > On 1/12/22 10:35, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > These look good to me! Thank you. I'm in process of compiling a test
> > > kernel.
> > 
> > Thanks Jarkko,
> > You can run the new test before and after applying the change and see
> > how it behaves. Also just noticed a mistake in the comment, sorry but
> > it was quite late when I sent it.
> > 
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If ret is > 0 then tpm_dev_transmit returned the size of the
> > +	 * response. If ret is < 0 then tpm_dev_transmit failed and
> > +	 * returned a return code.
> > +	 */
> > 
> > In the above could you please replace:
> > 
> > s/returned a return code/returned an error code/
> > 
> > before applying the patch. I would appreciate that.
> 
> Please send new versions, there's also this:
> 
> def test_flush_invlid_context()
> 
> I'd figure "invlid" should be  "invalid"
> 
> You can add, as these changes do not change the semantics of the
> patches:
> 
> Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> It's always best if you author the final version, as then a clear
> reference on what was accepted exist at lore.kernel.org.

Maybe it is good to mention that the test environment was libvirt hosted
QEMU using swtpm, which I tried for the first time, instead of real hadware
(libvirt has a nice property that it handles the startup/shutdown of
swtpm). I managed to run all tests so I guess swtpm is working properly.

/Jarkko



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux