On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 18:10:05 +0100, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > Hi Takashi, > > On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 17:11 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > Currently arch_ima_get_secureboot() and arch_get_ima_policy() are > > defined only when CONFIG_IMA is set, and this makes the code calling > > those functions without CONFIG_IMA failing. Although there is no such > > in-tree users, but the out-of-tree users already hit it. > > > > Move the declaration and the dummy definition of those functions > > outside ifdef-CONFIG_IMA block for fixing the undefined symbols. > > > > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> > > Joey's patch has a dependency on your patch, as seen by the kernel test > robot report. I'll drop the one line referencing in-tree/out-of-tree > sentence in the patch description, before picking it up as well. Sure, feel free to cook it :) thanks, Takashi
