On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 02:47:31PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > Extend 'securityfs' for support of IMA namespacing so that each > IMA (user) namespace can have its own front-end for showing the currently > active policy, the measurement list, number of violations and so on. > > Drop the addition dentry reference and simplify cleanup to work without > the additional reference. This enables simple cleanup of dentries upon > umount. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > security/inode.c | 14 ++++---------- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/security/inode.c b/security/inode.c > index fee01ff4d831..c77ae8ecc464 100644 > --- a/security/inode.c > +++ b/security/inode.c > @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static int securityfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc) > > static int securityfs_get_tree(struct fs_context *fc) > { > - return get_tree_single(fc, securityfs_fill_super); > + return get_tree_keyed(fc, securityfs_fill_super, fc->user_ns); > } > > static const struct fs_context_operations securityfs_context_ops = { > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ static struct file_system_type fs_type = { > .name = "securityfs", > .init_fs_context = securityfs_init_fs_context, > .kill_sb = kill_litter_super, > + .fs_flags = FS_USERNS_MOUNT, > }; > > /** > @@ -168,7 +169,6 @@ static struct dentry *securityfs_create_dentry(const char *name, umode_t mode, > inode->i_fop = fops; > } > d_instantiate(dentry, inode); > - dget(dentry); > inode_unlock(dir); > return dentry; > > @@ -306,23 +306,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(securityfs_create_symlink); > void securityfs_remove(struct dentry *dentry) > { > struct user_namespace *ns; > - struct inode *dir; > > if (!dentry || IS_ERR(dentry)) > return; > > ns = dentry->d_sb->s_user_ns; > > - dir = d_inode(dentry->d_parent); > - inode_lock(dir); > if (simple_positive(dentry)) { > - if (d_is_dir(dentry)) > - simple_rmdir(dir, dentry); > - else > - simple_unlink(dir, dentry); > + d_delete(dentry); > dput(dentry); In https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211210114934.tacjnwryihrsx6ln@wittgenstein I explained why d_delete()+d_put() only is wrong and how to fix it.