Re: [PATCH] tpm: tpm_tis_spi_cr50: Add default RNG quality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 29/10/21 05:03, Jarkko Sakkinen ha scritto:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 10:55:56AM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
Il 28/10/21 08:47, Jarkko Sakkinen ha scritto:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 02:02:33PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
To allow this device to fill the kernel's entropy pool at boot,
setup a default quality for the hwrng found in Cr50.

After some testing with rngtest and dieharder it was, in short,
discovered that the RNG produces fair quality randomness, giving
around 99.93% successes in rngtest FIPS140-2.

Notably, though, when testing with dieharder it was noticed that
the p-values distribution wasn't uniform in all the cases, so a
conservative quality value was chosen.

Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_cr50.c | 1 +
   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_cr50.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_cr50.c
index ea759af25634..d6195fb58036 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_cr50.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_cr50.c
@@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ int cr50_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
   	phy = &cr50_phy->spi_phy;
   	phy->flow_control = cr50_spi_flow_control;
   	phy->wake_after = jiffies;
+	phy->priv.rng_quality = 700;

How did you end up exactly to this number ('700')?

/Jarkko


As for what I've seen with rngtest, the number should be much higher, but
dieharder gave 3 WEAK results over 114, which isn't optimal. As also explained
in the commit message, the p-values distribution also wasn't uniform in all
of the cases, so I've applied an arbitrary penalty to the calculated values.

In any case, that's how it went:

The dieharder results were averaged, then normalized (0-1000) and re-averaged
with the rngtest result (where the result was given a score of 99.93% of 1000,
so 999.3), then aggregated together and averaged again.
An arbitrary penalty of -100 was applied due to the retrieved value, which
brings us finally to 700.

Please, add this to the commit message for reference.

In addition, please use a named constant instead of magic number, e.g.

/* Default quality for hwrng. */
#define TPM_CR50_DEFAULT_RNG_QUALITY            700

Regards,
- Angelo

/Jarkko


Sure! Will do for v2.

Thanks,
- Angelo



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux