On 10/11/2021 3:02 AM, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
Thanks for your attention. This is really tricky. I will contact trustedcomputinggroup first and give some suggestions, It would be best if a more standard algorithm name can be used from the source of the specification.
This was discussed in the TCG's TPM WG in February, 2020. At the time, someone said that there was a possibility of a 512-bit version in the future. For TCG members: https://members.trustedcomputinggroup.org/wg/TPMWG/mail/thread/61442#136758 My guess is that, since it's already in many TCG specs and code, TCG will want to leave it as is.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
