Re: [PATCH 0/2] tpm: use SM3 instead of SM3_256

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






On 10/11/2021 3:02 AM, Tianjia Zhang wrote:

Thanks for your attention. This is really tricky. I will contact trustedcomputinggroup first and give some suggestions, It would be best if a more standard algorithm name can be used from the source of the specification.

This was discussed in the TCG's TPM WG in February, 2020.  At the time,
someone said that there was a possibility of a 512-bit version in the
future.

For TCG members:

https://members.trustedcomputinggroup.org/wg/TPMWG/mail/thread/61442#136758

My guess is that, since it's already in many TCG specs and code, TCG
will want to leave it as is.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux