On Tue, 2021-10-12 at 19:40 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 07:47:22PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Mon, 2021-10-11 at 15:27 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > Up to now st33zp24_remove() returns zero unconditionally. Make it return > > > void instead which makes it easier to see in the callers that there is > > > no error to handle. > > > > So, void is not a return value. > > Hmm, would you be more happy with "Make it return no value"? I think > this is less understandable than "Make it return void". Do you have a > constructive suggestion how to formulate. I think it is semantically more correct to say that it does not return any value, given that it does not do that :-) You can just state e.g. "Make st33zp24_remove() a void function.", it is semantically sound and not really that confusing. /Jarkko
