Hi Alex, On Tue, 2021-08-31 at 20:12 -0600, Alex Henrie wrote: > Hello, could I get some feedback on this patch? Are there any > objections to including it upstream? Conceptually I don't have a problem with the patch, but I'd also like a test to go with it. Roberto posted "ima-evm-utils: Add UML support and tests for EVM portable signatures", which introduces using UML (User Mode Linux) for testing new kernel features, which, unfortunately, still needs to be reviewed and upstreamed. (Hint, hint help with reviewing.] Another option is to define an LTP test. In either case, a custom IMA policy would be defined in terms of a loopback mounted filesystem to avoid affecting the entire system. I'd appreciate your re-basing and re-posting this patch. thanks, Mimi
