On Tue, 2021-08-17 at 16:13 +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > On 17.08.21 15:55, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > I have no opinion as to whether this is/isn't a valid usecase. > > So you'd be fine with merging trusted key support as is and leave encrypted > key support to someone who has a valid use case and wants to argue > in its favor? That decision as to whether it makes sense to support trusted keys directly, based on the new trust sources, is a decision left up to the maintainer(s) of the new usecase and the new trust sources maintainer Jarkko. thanks, Mimi
