On 8/10/21 10:10 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 09:50:55PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 8/10/21 1:58 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 03:21:59PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Rename the field tpm_processing_cmd to tpm_status in ibmvtpm_dev and set
the TPM_STATUS_BUSY flag while the vTPM is busy processing a command.
default:
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
index 51198b137461..252f1cccdfc5 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
@@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ struct ibmvtpm_dev {
wait_queue_head_t wq;
u16 res_len;
u32 vtpm_version;
- u8 tpm_processing_cmd;
+ u8 tpm_status;
+#define TPM_STATUS_BUSY (1 << 0) /* vtpm is processing a command */
Declare this already in the fix, and just leave the rename here.
You mean the fix patch does not use 'true' anymore but uses the
TPM_STATUS_BUSY flag already but the name is still tpm_processing_cmd? And
literally only the renaming of this field is done in the 2nd patch?
I can fixup these patches, and use '1', instead of true. No need to send
new ones.
Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>
THANKS!
Stefan
/Jarkko
