Mimi,
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 10:10:55PM +0300, Vitaly Chikunov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 01:38:02PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-05-11 at 14:56 +0300, Vitaly Chikunov wrote:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/src/libimaevm.c b/src/libimaevm.c
> > > index 1c03768..bfce7ef 100644
> > > --- a/src/libimaevm.c
> > > +++ b/src/libimaevm.c
> > > @@ -1021,10 +1021,12 @@ static int sign_hash_v2(const char *algo, const unsigned char *hash,
> > > return -1;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - if (imaevm_params.keyid)
> > > + if (imaevm_params.keyid) {
> > > hdr->keyid = htonl(imaevm_params.keyid);
> > > - else
> > > - calc_keyid_v2(&hdr->keyid, name, pkey);
> > > + } else {
> > > + if (__read_keyid(&hdr->keyid, keyfile, KEYID_FILE_PEM_KEY))
> > > + calc_keyid_v2(&hdr->keyid, name, pkey);
> > > + }
> >
> > If the call to __read_keyid() was independent of the test and call to
> > calc_keyid_v2(), it would make reading code the easier to understand.
> >
> > result = __read_keyid(...);
> > if (result < 0)
> > calc_keyid_v2(...);
>
> No problem to add additional variable and check __read_keyid indirectly.
> But, how is this independent? Call to calc_keyid_v2 is dependent to
> __read_keyid result.
I think I understood what you meant.
Thanks,
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Mimi
> >
> > >
> > > st = "EVP_PKEY_CTX_new";
> > > if (!(ctx = EVP_PKEY_CTX_new(pkey, NULL)))
> >
