On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 07:33:44AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > Dear Jarkko, > > > Am 31.05.21 um 06:51 schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen: > > Do not torn down the system when getting invalid status from a TPM chip. > > Nit: Do not *tear* down …? Oops, a typo, thank you. > > This can happen when panic-on-warn is used. > > Hmm, I’d say it works as expected then? Shouldn’t an invalid status of an > important device like TPM considered a warning? By warning do you mean WARN() or pr_warn()? /Jarkko
