On 2021/5/10 4:41, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 10:54:44AM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
>> Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
>> case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function.
>>
>> Fixes: 58472f5cd4f6("tpm: validate TPM 2.0 commands")
>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> In the commit message:
>
> 1. Instead of writing "a negative error code", write -EFAULT.
OK, I will change it.
> 2. Some explanation of the choice.
Do you mean why I choice error code -EFAULT? There's a similar one above this branch.
if (nr_commands > 0xFFFFF) {
rc = -EFAULT;
goto out;
}
>
>> ---
>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
>> index eff1f12d981a..c84d23951219 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
>> @@ -656,6 +656,7 @@ int tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>>
>> if (nr_commands !=
>> be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)&buf.data[TPM_HEADER_SIZE + 5])) {
>> + rc = -EFAULT;
>> tpm_buf_destroy(&buf);
>> goto out;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>>
>>
>
> Other than that looks good.
>
> /Jarkko
>
> .
>
