Hi Jarko, On 3/16/21 8:18 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:34:01PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 2/11/21 2:09 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> Hi Jerry, >>> >>> It looks like there still is an issue with the recent changes to the tpm_tis IRQ >>> handling. At least I think those are the cause I did not dive any deeper, >>> I just noticed that we (Fedora) have been receiving an aweful lot of >>> kernel tpm_tis_send_data backtraces with most starting with tpm_tis_probe_irq_... >>> >>> See for example: >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912167 >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927610 >>> >>> Those are just the 3 which landed in my inbox today, for much more see: >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=tpm_tis_send_data >>> (this shows 18 bugs atm). >>> >>> These were reported through the Fedora ABRT tools which automatically >>> collects backtraces, the bugs have links to the ABRT reports, e.g. : >>> https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/reports/28155/ >>> https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/reports/37107/ >>> >>> The 28155 report says that so far there have been 308,412 (ouch) automatic >>> uploads of that particular variant of these backtraces >>> >>> Note the second (37107) retrace report is about this happening >>> on resume, rather then on probe/tpm_tis_probe_irq_... time. >>> >>> Did your work on this work land in 5.10 ? Or could it be that the >>> issue is an incomplete backport to the 5.10.y stable series ? >> >> Ping ? >> >> It is raining bug-reports about this: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=tpm_tis_send_data >> >> Currently lists 25 bugs and that is excluding bugs which have already >> been marked as a duplicate. >> >> Can someone involved in the patch-series which is causing this regression >> please take a look at these kernel backtraces ? >> >> Regards, >> >> Hans > > I incorporated two fixes to this issue to my last PR, which were taken > to the mainline. What is the situation with the mainline? Thank you for your reply and sorry for being slow to respond. Is this expected to be fixed in 5.11, or when you say mainline you main Linus' master branch / so the fixes are in 5.12 only ? The reason I'm asking is because we just received another bugreport about this against 5.11.17. The bug is marked private (our tool to automatically file bugs for kernel backtraces does this) so let me just copy and paste the trace here: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3060 at drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c:205 tpm_tis_status+0x66/0x70 CPU: 0 PID: 3060 Comm: systemd-sleep Not tainted 5.11.17-200.fc33.x86_64 #1 Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP ProBook 6460b/161D, BIOS 68SCE Ver. F.63 05/27/2016 RIP: 0010:tpm_tis_status+0x66/0x70 Code: 23 75 05 48 83 c4 10 c3 31 c0 80 3d 38 02 56 01 00 75 f0 48 c7 c7 94 67 43 96 88 44 24 07 c6 05 24 02 56 01 01 e8 4a 53 3c 00 <0f> 0b 0f b6 44 24 07 eb d0 90 66 66 66 66 90 41 57 41 56 41 55 41 RSP: 0018:ffffaac581427b10 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 000000000000001b RBX: ffff9dc800b93000 RCX: ffff9dc83b418ac8 RDX: 00000000ffffffd8 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: ffff9dc83b418ac0 RBP: ffff9dc800b93000 R08: ffffffff96a64ec0 R09: ffffaac581427ab0 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 000000002d2d2d2d R12: ffff9dc80667c268 R13: ffff9dc801fd1000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffaac581427bca FS: 00007f8f0f32c000(0000) GS:ffff9dc83b400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000557044ec6c86 CR3: 0000000062e92001 CR4: 00000000000606f0 Call Trace: tpm_tis_send_data+0x2b/0x230 tpm_tis_send_main+0x1e/0xe0 tpm_transmit+0xd8/0x3d0 tpm_transmit_cmd+0x25/0x90 tpm1_do_selftest+0x88/0x130 ? _cond_resched+0x16/0x40 tpm_tis_resume+0x4d/0x120 ? pnpacpi_resume+0x1b/0xa0 ? pnp_bus_suspend+0x10/0x10 pnp_bus_resume+0x63/0x90 dpm_run_callback+0x4c/0x120 device_resume+0xa7/0x200 dpm_resume+0xce/0x2c0 dpm_resume_end+0xd/0x20 suspend_devices_and_enter+0x195/0x750 pm_suspend.cold+0x329/0x374 state_store+0x71/0xd0 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x124/0x1b0 new_sync_write+0x108/0x180 vfs_write+0x1bc/0x270 ksys_write+0x4f/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x7f8f102ec4e7 Code: 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24 RSP: 002b:00007ffe87216bf8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007f8f102ec4e7 RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 00007ffe87216ce0 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 00007ffe87216ce0 R08: 000055c485d835e0 R09: 00007f8f103830c0 R10: 00007f8f10382fc0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000004 R13: 000055c485d7f650 R14: 0000000000000004 R15: 00007f8f103bf720 Regards, Hans
