On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 01:46:46PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 13:50 +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > [Resending since the previous mail somehow hasn't made it onto the list.]
> >
> > While working on a patch to port ecryptfs to use clone_private_mount() I
> > hit the splat in [1] with v5.12-rc6 (Without any of my changes.). To
> > reproduce this you can use the config in [5]. Then run the scripts [2]
> > and [3] in two terminals. The kernel command line was [4]:
> >
> > while true; do ./test.sh; done
> > while true; do ./test2.sh; done
> >
> > and wait for [1] to appear.
> >
> > The two test scripts aren't specifically designed to trigger this issue.
> > They were stress tests for my ecryptfs clone_private_mount() port. They
> > just allow to trigger this issue.
> >
> > From a very uninformed position it seemed that:
> >
> > void integrity_inode_free(struct inode *inode)
> > {
> > struct integrity_iint_cache *iint;
> >
> > if (!IS_IMA(inode))
> > return;
>
> Thank you for all the details.
>
> A builtin IMA policy wasn't specified on the boot command line. Unless
> a custom IMA policy is loaded, it shouldn't get beyond this
> point. Before looking any farther, I would appreciate your confirming
> that you've loaded a custom IMA policy. To see if a policy has been
> loaded, cat /sys/kernel/security/ima/policy.
Ah, interesting thank you. Here's the output:
sudo cat /sys/kernel/security/ima/policy
dont_measure fsmagic=0x9fa0
dont_measure fsmagic=0x62656572
dont_measure fsmagic=0x64626720
dont_measure fsmagic=0x1021994
dont_measure fsmagic=0x1cd1
dont_measure fsmagic=0x42494e4d
dont_measure fsmagic=0x73636673
dont_measure fsmagic=0xf97cff8c
dont_measure fsmagic=0x43415d53
dont_measure fsmagic=0x27e0eb
dont_measure fsmagic=0x63677270
dont_measure fsmagic=0x6e736673
dont_measure fsmagic=0xde5e81e4
measure func=MMAP_CHECK mask=MAY_EXEC
measure func=BPRM_CHECK mask=MAY_EXEC
measure func=FILE_CHECK mask=^MAY_READ euid=0
measure func=FILE_CHECK mask=^MAY_READ uid=0
measure func=MODULE_CHECK
measure func=FIRMWARE_CHECK
measure func=POLICY_CHECK
Hm, note that ecryptfs is not in this list so I guess ecryptfs would be
measured?
Thanks for the quick reply!
Christian
