Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] Carry forward IMA measurement log on kexec on ARM64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 11:10 -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> On 12/1/20 3:34 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 06:38 -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> >> On 11/21/20 5:57 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:22:35AM -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> > 
> >>>>    arch/powerpc/include/asm/kexec.h       |   1 -
> >>>>    arch/powerpc/kexec/Makefile            |   7 +-
> >>>>    arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load.c         |  32 --------
> >>>>    arch/powerpc/kexec/ima.c               | 106 ++-----------------------
> >>>>    drivers/of/Makefile                    |   9 +++
> >>>
> >>>>    drivers/of/ima_kexec.c                 |  91 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>    drivers/of/kexec_fdt.c                 |  55 +++++++++++++
> >>>
> >>> Does this need to be 2 files? Just kexec.c?
> >>
> >> Since the functions defined in "ima_kexec.c" and "kexec_fdt.c" are
> >> enabled on 2 different kernel CONFIGs, keeping them in 2 files enables
> >> us to avoid using "#ifdef" in C files.
> > 
> > Normally that is true, but just as all of the kexec related functions
> > are co-located in ima/ima_kexec.c, co-locating all of the kexec related
> > functions in drivers/of makes sense.
> > 
> 
> Sounds good - i'll make the change.
> Instead of "#ifdef" will use "IS_ENABLED" macro, and define the kexec 
> related functions in drivers/of/ima_kexec.c

Perhaps name the file kexec.c, as Rob suggested.

Mimi




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux