On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 19:00 +0000, Elliott, Robert (Servers) wrote:
> ...
> > + * The first argument is the TPM algorithm id and the second is
> > the
> > + * hash used as both the suffix and the group name. Note: the
> > group
> > + * name is a directory in the top level tpm class with the name
> > + * pcr-<hash>, so it must not clash with any other names already
> > + * in the sysfs directory.
> > + */
> > +PCR_ATTR_BUILD(TPM_ALG_SHA1, sha1);
> > +PCR_ATTR_BUILD(TPM_ALG_SHA256, sha256);
> > +PCR_ATTR_BUILD(TPM_ALG_SHA384, sha384);
> > +PCR_ATTR_BUILD(TPM_ALG_SHA512, sha512);
> > +PCR_ATTR_BUILD(TPM_ALG_SM3_256, sm3);
>
> The latest PC Client Platform TPM Profile and TPM 2.0 Part 2
> Structures specs also define codes for three SHA-3 hash algorithms:
> TPM_ALG_SHA3_256
> TPM_ALG_SHA3_384
> TPM_ALG_SHA3_512
this is PTP 1.05 which was published this September? The basic reason
is it wasn't there when this patch was first published, but they can
always be added ... the whole idea is to be extensible.
> ...
> > +
> > + /* add one group for each bank hash */
> > + for (i = 0; i < chip->nr_allocated_banks; i++) {
> > + switch (chip->allocated_banks[i].alg_id) {
> > + case TPM_ALG_SHA1:
> > + chip->groups[chip->groups_cnt++] =
> > &pcr_group_sha1;
> > + break;
> > + case TPM_ALG_SHA256:
> > + chip->groups[chip->groups_cnt++] =
> > &pcr_group_sha256;
> > + break;
> > + case TPM_ALG_SHA384:
> > + chip->groups[chip->groups_cnt++] =
> > &pcr_group_sha384;
> > + break;
> > + case TPM_ALG_SHA512:
> > + chip->groups[chip->groups_cnt++] =
> > &pcr_group_sha512;
> > + break;
> > + case TPM_ALG_SM3_256:
> > + chip->groups[chip->groups_cnt++] =
> > &pcr_group_sm3;
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + /*
> > + * If this warning triggers, send a patch to
> > + * add both a PCR_ATTR_BUILD() macro above for
> > + * the missing algorithm as well as an
> > + * additional case in this switch statement.
> > + */
> > + WARN(1, "TPM with unsupported bank algorthm
> > 0x%04x",
> > + chip->allocated_banks[i].alg_id);
>
> algorithm is missing the letter i.
Yes, I'll fix that.
> It might help to print the bank id (variable i) as well.
I'm not sure how it helps the user. We deliberately hide the bank
numbers because all banks in sysfs are referred to by hash ... how
would exposing the bank number here help?
James
