On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 03:02:41PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 10:37, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 09:31:42PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > > > Add support for TEE based trusted keys where TEE provides the functionality > > > to seal and unseal trusted keys using hardware unique key. Also, this is > > > an alternative in case platform doesn't possess a TPM device. > > > > > > This patch-set has been tested with OP-TEE based early TA which is already > > > merged in upstream [1]. > > > > Is the new RPI400 computer a platform that can be used for testing > > patch sets like this? I've been looking for a while something ARM64 > > based with similar convenience as Intel NUC's, and on the surface > > this new RPI product looks great for kernel testing purposes. > > Here [1] is the list of supported versions of Raspberry Pi in OP-TEE. > The easiest approach would be to pick up a supported version or else > do an OP-TEE port for an unsupported one (which should involve minimal > effort). > > [1] https://optee.readthedocs.io/en/latest/building/devices/rpi3.html#what-versions-of-raspberry-pi-will-work > > -Sumit If porting is doable, then I'll just order RPI 400, and test with QEMU up until either I port OP-TEE myself or someone else does it. For seldom ARM testing, RPI 400 is really convenient device with its boxed form factor. /Jarkko
