On Sat, 2020-10-31 at 20:08 -0700, Tushar Sugandhi wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On 2020-10-30 1:37 p.m., Paul Moore wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:43 PM Tushar Sugandhi > > <tusharsu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Unless this patch set is specifically dependent on the two patches in > >>> the SELinux tree beyond v5.10.0-rc1, please base it on v5.10.0-rc1. > >> > >> Thanks Mimi. We don't have dependencies on those two patches in SELinux > >> tree. > >> > >> We'll base our changes on v5.10.0-rc1 in SELinux tree. > >> > >> Thanks for the quick response. > > > > I'm not as fast as Mimi, but I thought it might be worthwhile to > > provide a bit more detail as to what I expect from SELinux kernel > > submissions. I believe most other maintainers operate in a similar > > manner, but I obviously can't speak for them. > Thanks a lot for the detailed information Paul. > Its very helpful, and we appreciate it. > > > > Unless there is an exception due to a previous discussion, I ask that > > all SELinux kernel patches be based on either the selinux/next branch > > or Linus' current tree. If your patch(set) applies cleanly to either > > of those branches, and passes review, I'll merge it into the > > selinux/next branch taking care of any merge conflicts that may arise. > We will base on SeLinux -> next branch, as you/Mimi suggested. Unless there was a compelling reason for basing it on the SELinux branch, I asked that you base the changes on v5.10.0-rc1 (or later), which has nothing to do with the SELinux branch. Once this patch set is reviewed and ready to be upstreamed, a topic branch will be created containing at least the IMA patches. The decision as to how the the SELinux patch will be upstreamed will be made at that point. That discussion will be between Paul and me. thanks, Mimi
