Hi all, ... > > Mikhail, my mistake. Thank you for the correction! Testing the > > libressl changes should be a lot easier now. Please remember to > > include a distro travis.yml example. > What do you mean? Do you mean adding testing of building ima-evm-utils against LibreSSL? Yes, I understand Mimi wants this. > Which environment is used there and which ones are available? There are not many dsitros where LibreSSL is pre-packaged [1], in many of them it is not updated often enough. Look at the supported distros in travis/ in next or next-testing branch. Could you use some bleeding edge distro (Tumbleweed or Fedora?) You could handl LibreSSL vs. openSSL with variable, similarly like IBM TSS and Intel TSS are handled (with $TSS variable). > I would choose either ROSA where I myself maintain LibreSSL and ima-evm-utils or Arch Linux, is at least Arch Linux available in CI/CD environment? > Won't we have to deal with often breakages of other parts of the rolling Arch Linux? > Also, I can just build LibreSSL from source in any available distro, e.g. Ubuntu, but the pipeline will take a lot more time. Please use distro package. Not only it's faster (as you noted), but it also covers more users (IMHO most of the people use distro package, not a git version). > How do we better deal with it? Kind regards, Petr > [1] https://repology.org/project/libressl/versions
