Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] IMA: generalize keyring specific measurement constructs

[Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Mimi for your overall feedback on this series.
Really appreciate it.

On 2020-10-22 12:39 p.m., Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Tushar,
>
> On Wed, 2020-09-23 at 12:20 -0700, Tushar Sugandhi wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> > index fe1df373c113..31a772d8a86b 100644
> > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> > @@ -451,15 +451,19 @@ int ima_lsm_policy_change(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
> >   }
> >   
> >   /**
> > - * ima_match_keyring - determine whether the keyring matches the measure rule
> > - * @rule: a pointer to a rule
> > - * @keyring: name of the keyring to match against the measure rule
> > + * ima_match_rule_data - determine whether the given func_data matches
> > + *			 the measure rule data
> > + * @rule: IMA policy rule
> > + * @opt_list: rule data to match func_data against
> > + * @func_data: data to match against the measure rule data
> >    * @cred: a pointer to a credentials structure for user validation
> >    *
> > - * Returns true if keyring matches one in the rule, false otherwise.
> > + * Returns true if func_data matches one in the rule, false otherwise.
> >    */
> > -static bool ima_match_keyring(struct ima_rule_entry *rule,
> > -			      const char *keyring, const struct cred *cred)
> > +static bool ima_match_rule_data(struct ima_rule_entry *rule,
> > +				const struct ima_rule_opt_list *opt_list,
> > +				const char *func_data,
> > +				const struct cred *cred)
> >   {
> >   	bool matched = false;
> >   	size_t i;
> > @@ -467,14 +471,14 @@ static bool ima_match_keyring(struct ima_rule_entry *rule,
> >   	if ((rule->flags & IMA_UID) && !rule->uid_op(cred->uid, rule->uid))
> >   		return false;
> >   
> > -	if (!rule->keyrings)
> > +	if (!opt_list)
> >   		return true;
>
> The opt_list should be based on rule->func.  There shouldn't be a need
> to pass it as a variable.
>
> Mimi
Makes sense. Will do. Thanks Mimi.
~Tushar
> >   
> > -	if (!keyring)
> > +	if (!func_data)
> >   		return false;
> >   
> > -	for (i = 0; i < rule->keyrings->count; i++) {
> > -		if (!strcmp(rule->keyrings->items[i], keyring)) {
> > +	for (i = 0; i < opt_list->count; i++) {
> > +		if (!strcmp(opt_list->items[i], func_data)) {
> >   			matched = true;
> >   			break;
> >   		}