Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] tpm_tis: Fix check_locality for correct locality acquisition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



James Bottomley @ 2020-10-01 11:09 MST:

> The TPM TIS specification says the TPM signals the acquisition of
> locality when the TMP_ACCESS_REQUEST_USE bit goes to one *and* the
> TPM_ACCESS_REQUEST_USE bit goes to zero.  Currently we only check the
> former not the latter, so check both.  Adding the check on
> TPM_ACCESS_REQUEST_USE should fix the case where the locality is
> re-requested before the TPM has released it.  In this case the
> locality may get released briefly before it is reacquired, which
> causes all sorts of problems. However, with the added check,
> TPM_ACCESS_REQUEST_USE should remain 1 until the second request for
> the locality is granted.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> v2: added this patch
> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> index 92c51c6cfd1b..f3ecde8df47d 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> @@ -125,7 +125,8 @@ static bool check_locality(struct tpm_chip *chip, int l)
>  	if (rc < 0)
>  		return false;
>  
> -	if ((access & (TPM_ACCESS_ACTIVE_LOCALITY | TPM_ACCESS_VALID)) ==
> +	if ((access & (TPM_ACCESS_ACTIVE_LOCALITY | TPM_ACCESS_VALID
> +		       | TPM_ACCESS_REQUEST_USE)) ==
>  	    (TPM_ACCESS_ACTIVE_LOCALITY | TPM_ACCESS_VALID)) {
>  		priv->locality = l;
>  		return true;

Reviewed-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux