Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] tpm_tis: fix interrupts (again)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



James Bottomley @ 2020-10-13 08:24 MST:

> On Tue, 2020-10-13 at 08:15 -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
>> Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2020-10-12 18:17 MST:
>> 
>> > On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:09:20AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
>> > > The current state of the TIS TPM is that interrupts have been
>> > > globally disabled by various changes.  The problems we got
>> > > reported the last time they were enabled was interrupt
>> > > storms.  With my own TIS TPM, I've found that this is caused
>> > > because my TPM doesn't do legacy cycles, The TIS spec (chapter
>> > > 6.1 "Locality Usage Per Register") requires any TIS TPM without
>> > > legacy cycles not to act on any write to an interrupt register
>> > > unless the locality is enabled.  This means if an interrupt fires
>> > > after we relinquish the locality, the TPM_EOI in the interrupt
>> > > routine is ineffective meaning the same interrupt triggers over
>> > > and over again.  This problem also means we can have trouble
>> > > setting up interrupts on TIS TPMs because the current init
>> > > code does the setup before the locality is claimed for the first
>> > > time.
>> > > 
>> > > James
>> > 
>> > You should consider expanding the audience.
>
> Well, most people interested in testing this sort of thing are already
> on the integrity list.
>
>> >  Jerry, once you have some bandwidth (no rush, does not land before
>> > rc2), it would be great that if you could try this. I'm emphasizing
>> > this just because of the intersection. I think it would also make
>> > senset to get tested-by from Nayna.
>> 
>> I will run some tests on some other systems I have access to. As
>> noted in the other email I did a quick test with a t490s with an
>> older bios that exhibits the problem originally reported when
>> Stefan's patch enabled interrupts.
>
> Well, it means there's still some other problem.  I was hoping that
> because the rainbow pass system originally exhibited the same symptoms
> (interrupt storm) fixing it would also fix the t490 and the ineffective
> EOI bug looked like a great candidate for being the root cause.
>

Adding Hans to the list.

IIUC in the t490s case the problem lies with the hardware itself. Hans,
is that correct?

> How amenable are you to debugging this?  I originally figured out the
> problem with the rainbow pass by putting ratelimited printks in the
> interrupt routine and most of the TIS transmission ones, but it's
> somewhat labour intensive doing it this way.
>
> James




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux